Prediction of Emilio Nava [140th] vs Mathys Erhard [281st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W W
Form
L W L W L L W L W WHead-2-Head: Nava 1 - 0 Erhard
They have played 3 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Erhard winning 1. The last match between Nava and Erhard was at the Oeiras 3 Challenger, 16-04-2024, First, Clay with Emilio Nava getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | 1 |
| Mathys Erhard | 0 |
| Nava | Stats | Erhard |
|---|---|---|
| 76% (28-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 56% (10-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 140 | Ranking | 281 |
| 124 | Highest Rank | 281 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 9 |
| 60% (216-146) | Career Total W/L | 62% (238-147) |
| $442,385 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:3:21 | Average Match Time | 2:3:21 |
| 61% (54/88) | 1st Serve % | 58% (41/71) |
| 76% (41/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (31/41) |
| 47% (16/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
| 37% (26/71) | Return Points Win % | 35% (31/88) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emilio Nava vs Mathys Erhard Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nava 1 - 0 Erhard
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 46.77% of points on their second serve, while Erhard has won 45.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 47.34% of their opponent's second serve points, while Erhard has won 46.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25% and 29.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 52.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Erhard has saved 57.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 57.5% of matches played (W/L 46/ 34), with Erhard winning 70.73% (W/L 58/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 97/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Erhard has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 200/ 104), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 45/ 24), where as Erhard has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 82.22% of matches (W/L 37/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nava winning 1 times and Erhard being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Erhard winning 1. The last match between Nava and Erhard was at the Oeiras 3 Challenger, 16-04-2024, First, Clay with Emilio Nava getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nava and Erhard have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nava winning 1 times and Erhard 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nava winning 0, and Erhard 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of 296.64 while Erhard has played against players with an average rank of 147.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Erhard has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 38.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Erhard has converted 35.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Emilio Nava vs Mathys Erhard Best Odds For The Match
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Liam Draxl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Chris Rodesch
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Nicolas Kicker
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Gonzalo Bueno
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mathys Erhard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 3-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Mathys Erhard
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Murphy Cassone
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Mathys Erhard
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
82 of
117)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
9 of
24)
Break Points Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
53%
(
54 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
64 of
117)
111
Total Points Won
107
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Carlos Lopez Montagud
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Mathys Erhard
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Maxime Janvier
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
37%
(
22 of
59)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
10
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
17 of
22)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrej Martin
Player
Mathys Erhard
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Nava vs Erhard?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Nava Vs Erhard is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (216/146) | Win/Loss | 62% (238/147) |
| 56% (479/373) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (532/357) |
| 52% (4309/4013) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4554/3822) |
| 0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2107 | Aces Total | 779 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1020 | Total Double Faults | 894 |
| 1:36:32 | Average Match Time | 1:29:15 |
| 283.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 232.13 |
| 63% (15613/24946) | 1st Serve % | 65% (14107/21601) |
| 71% (11065/15613) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9378/14107) |
| 51% (4799/9333) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3707/7493) |
| 42% (923/2212) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1171/2586) |
| 38% (9442/24975) | Return Points Win % | 43% (9602/22133) |
| 60% (211/353) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (234/378) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 48% (76/157) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (51/89) |
| 62% (74/120) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (63/120) |
| 87% (200/173) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (229/202) |
| 14% (200/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (229/26) |
| 26% (162/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (156/36) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emilio Nava
View full predicted draw for Nava
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
